“No one in America will ever know the number of innocent people convicted, sent to prison, and even executed because of the flood of rotten forensics and bogus scientific opinions presented to juries. In this intriguing and beautifully crafted book, Innocence Project lawyer M. Chris Fabricant illustrates how wrongful convictions occur, and he makes it obvious how they could be prevented.”
—John Grisham, author of A Time for Mercy

“An attorney uses the cases of clients who were wrongly convicted and imprisoned to question the status of forensics as reliable evidence, arguing that it is ‘subjective speculation masquerading as science, typically tilted in the government’s favor against an indigent person of color.’”
—New York Times Book Review, Paperback Row

“Fierce and absorbing . . . Fabricant chronicles the battles he and his colleagues have fought to unravel a century of fraudulent experts and the bad court decisions that allowed them to thrive.”
—Washington Post

“Readers—especially those fond of TV detectives and their infallible crime labs—will be flabbergasted by [Fabricant’s] list of forensic techniques long used by labs, including the FBI’s, and proclaimed by highly paid ‘expert witnesses’ that, when investigated by competent researchers, turn out to be unreliable or worthless . . . A brilliant rebuttal of junk science in the courtroom.”
—Kirkus Reviews, STARRED Review

One of Kirkus Reviews’ 8 Big New Nonfiction Books from Small Presses

“This j’accuse provides a broader look at a deeply disturbing aspect of a criminal justice system already considered racist and biased by many . . . The endemic injustices Fabricant lays bare will likely shake even advocates of robust law and order approaches.”
—Publishers Weekly, STARRED Review

“Junk Science is a book that should be on every true-crime reader’s shelves. It is an eye-opening and infuriating tour through the failed idealism of forensic science as a discipline, how certain techniques like analyzing fibers and bite marks wilt under scrutiny, and how the criteria for ‘experts’ in a courtroom can be laughable at best and dangerous at worst, causing scores of innocent people to lose decades behind bars (or, in some heartbreaking instances, their lives).”
—Slate, one of “The Best New True Crime That Won’t Make You Feel Gross”

“M. Chris Fabricant’s ground-breaking new work is here to explain (and explain well) what happened, where we went wrong, and how many have paid the price of junk science convictions. Fabricant’s long involved with the Innocence Project lends his book credence and weight, as he details overturned convictions, shoddy research, and the vast egos that underpinned some of the worst work in the history of criminal (in)justice.”
—CrimeReads, One of the Best Nonfiction Crime Books of 2022

One of CrimeReads Best Nonfiction Books of April 2022 and 10 Best Books of the Week

“Spellbinding . . . Junk Science is a sobering testament to the need for humility—for admitting that our knowledge is limited and fallible—both in science and in the law. Questions of justice are too important to be left to hocus-pocus.”
—Washington Examiner

“I believed in the polygraph test, in an unthinking way, right up until last week when I read a new book by M. Chris Fabricant, Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System, which carefully and unarguably explains that almost every forensic science is unreliable, and most are entirely bogus.”
—The Spectator

“Few people are more qualified to write about wrongful convictions in the U.S. than M. Chris Fabricant . . . Fabricant’s book shows how faulty ideas from blood spatter analysis to shaken baby syndrome were developed, infected court systems, and ruined a still-untold number of lives.”
—Reason

“Fabricant expertly delves into now-discredited forensic tactics, including bite mark analysis and outmoded methods used in arson investigations, to show how investigators and prosecutors often used pseudo science to put innocent people in prison for decades.”
—Texas Observer

“Speaking of the Innocence Project, Fabricant’s work as its director of strategic litigation has given him unique perspective into how bad science leads to worse results—namely, an untold number of wrongful convictions.”
—David Lat for Original Jurisdiction, a May 2022 Lat’s Legal Library selection

“Inherently fascinating and impressively written, exceptionally well organized and presented . . . Singularly informative, thought-provoking, and critically important.”
—Midwest Book Review

“Junk Science is beautifully written, a compilation of stories of trials, appeals, the vagaries of purported science in the courtroom, and the author’s personal journey across two landscapes—the many states where he went to challenge bitemark or similar evidence and his own journey of growth as a lawyer and friend to those jailed based on what is at times head-shakingly bad proof . . . Put simply, Junk Science is essential reading . . .”
—ABA Criminal Justice Section Magazine

“Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System is a captivating, evocative, and disheartening narrative assessment of forensic science in the American judicial system. It is an entertaining, intriguing, and insightful mainstream audience read—not a cathartic exercise . . .”
—Champion Magazine

“Through his book, Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System, Fabricant said he is trying to create a new genre—not true crime, but ‘untrue crime’—showcasing misused forensic science and its impact on innocent people.”
—Sun-Sentinel

“Eye-opening, endlessly engaging, and equally infuriating—this book is a must-read.”
—Booklist

“Often riveting, well-researched, and utterly convincing, this book sounds a frightening alarm about unreliable expert testimony in the courtroom.”
—New York Journal of Books

“An Innocence Project attorney has a new book out that he hopes will bring more awareness to the kind of ‘junk science’ that leads to wrongful convictions.“
—Oxygen

“Chris’s groundbreaking work for the Innocence Project has exposed the corrosive effect that junk ‘science’ has in our criminal justice system. He’s a brilliant writer and legal mind. A must-read.”
—Pamela Colloff

“Fabricant . . . makes a number of strong points, and anyone who reads this book will conclude that certain changes need to be made.”
—The Strand Magazine

“Chris Fabricant has written a compelling account of how the ‘junk science’ of connecting bitemarks to human teeth has resulted in dozens of wrongful convictions of innocent people in America . . . This book powerfully exposes how forensic dentists have used methods with no scientific basis to convict the wrong people and the guilty people went free.”
—Maurice Possley, Pulitzer Prize–winning author

“Fact by fact, case by case, scandal by scandal, M. Chris Fabricant expertly dissects some of the grossest failures of challenged forensic science techniques, providing a hard-nosed insider’s tour of a fifty-year legal war to improve the US criminal justice system. Junk Science is for anyone wanting to go behind the headlines of wrongful convictions, who hungers to probe their root causes, and who is fighting to win criminal justice reform, inside and out of the system. Fabricant writes here like a combatant with a duty to bear witness, burning to teach an adversarial system how to come to terms with scientific truth and to show the monstrous toll of its failures.”
—Spencer S. Hsu, investigative reporter, two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist

“Junk Science is a powerful exposé of a broken criminal legal system, deeply researched and moving. A must-read for anyone interested in the role unreliable evidence plays in maintaining the status quo.”
—Christina Swarns, executive director of the Innocence Project

“We think that science in the courtroom always serves justice—well, think again! This fascinating book by Innocence Project attorney M. Chris Fabricant shows how junk science in our criminal justice system is used to convict the innocent. Forget CSI and what you think of science in the courtroom, this eye-opening book from the front line of the battle for true justice could not be more urgent.”
—Itiel Dror, Senior Cognitive Neuroscience Researcher, University College London